Compare Your Options
See how Autonoma stacks up against traditional development, low-code platforms, and offshore teams.
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional Development | Low-Code Platforms | Offshore Teams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Build Time | Days | Months | Weeks | Months |
Cost | 90% Less | High | Medium | Medium-High |
Maintenance | Autonomous | Manual | Limited | Manual |
Scalability | Infinite | Manual | Limited | Manual |
Detailed Comparison
Deep dive into what matters most
Speed & Delivery
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Time to MVP | 3-5 days | 3-6 months | 2-4 weeks | 2-4 months |
Feature velocity | Hours | Weeks | Days | Weeks |
Deployment speed | Minutes | Days | Hours | Days |
Cost & Resources
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial cost | $ | $$$$ | $$ | $$$ |
Ongoing maintenance | $ | $$$ | $$ | $$$ |
Hidden costs | None | High | Medium | High |
Quality & Capabilities
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Code quality | ||||
Custom functionality | ||||
Scalability | ||||
Security best practices | Limited |
Operations & Maintenance
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Self-healing | ||||
Predictive monitoring | ||||
24/7 availability | Limited | |||
Auto-scaling | Manual | Limited | Manual |
Integration & Interoperability
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-built integrations | 500+ integrations | Custom build | Limited | Custom build |
API connectivity | Zero-config | Manual setup | Template-based | Manual setup |
Legacy system support | ||||
Real-time sync | Limited |
Lifecycle & Evolution
Feature | Autonoma | Traditional | Low-Code | Offshore |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complete SDLC coverage | Build→Operate→Audit | Build only | Build only | Build only |
Self-evolution | Continuous improvement | |||
Automated optimization | ||||
Learning from usage |
Pros and Cons
Every approach has trade-offs, but Autonoma's value overwhelms the rest
Autonoma
Pros
- 1000x faster development
- Complete SDLC automation
- Self-evolving software
- 500+ zero-config integrations
- No technical debt
- Predictable costs
Cons
- Clear requirements (mitigated with pre-built templates)
- AI collaboration learning (mitigated with intuitive interfaces)
Traditional Development
Pros
- Full control
- Custom everything
- Established practices
Cons
- Expensive
- Slow delivery
- Hard to scale
- Technical debt
- Maintenance burden
Low-Code Platforms
Pros
- Visual interface
- Quick prototypes
- No coding required
Cons
- Limited customization
- Vendor lock-in
- Performance issues
- Not enterprise-ready
Offshore Teams
Pros
- Lower hourly rates
- Large talent pool
- Follow-the-sun model
Cons
- Communication barriers
- Time zone challenges
- Quality varies
- Hidden costs
- IP concerns
See the Difference for Yourself
Watch Autonoma build a complete application in minutes